Autopsy report · NCT00445263

Comparison of Two Treatment Strategies in Patients With an Acute Coronary Syndrome Without ST Elevation

“Because of inclusion delay”

The sponsor’s own words in the registry.

Life of this trial

• Ran for about 6 years 4 months before it stopped.
• 170 participants enrolled.
• Results were posted on the registry 1 year 7 months after it ended.

Vital statistics

Status

Terminated

Phase

Phase 4

Sponsor

Hospital Avicenne

Sponsor type

University, hospital or other

Conditions

CORONARY DISEASE

Interventions

TIROFIBAN; CORONAROGRAPHY

Participants

170

Sites

1

Countries

France

Trials that died the same way

• Relapse Prevention With Escitalopram or Nortriptyline Following Electro-Convulsive Treatment (DUAG-7)
  “Slow inclusion” (71% match in meaning)
• PET / CT With 18F-FDG: Does it Optimize the I 123-MIBG Imaging Results in the Search for Discriminating Factors for the Implementation of an Implantable Defibrillator?
  “Inclusion rate too slow / infeasible.” (64% match in meaning)
• Evaluating the Necessity of TOT Implantation in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Occult Stress Urinary Incontinence
  “lack of inclusion” (61% match in meaning)
• Development of a Predictive Score for Local Complications of Femoral Bifurcation Surgery
  “lack of inclusions” (60% match in meaning)
• Cutting Balloon Versus Non-cutting Balloon for the Treatment of Venous Stenosis in the Fistulas of Hemodialyzed Patients
  “Inclusion curve too slow.” (59% match in meaning)

Look deeper

• The official registry record (the source of truth)
• Record history: every change the sponsor made
• Open it in the database

Everything here comes from the current ClinicalTrials.gov record. The timeline uses the record’s dates; dates marked planned are the sponsor’s plans. The cause of death is an automatic, unverified label. This is research information, not medical advice.